Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 7

• 0%

  1-2-Oscar9 months, 1 week ago

  This is good. I only get 54 Mbps now. But I'm not sure that I want to do business with Comcast (or even if I CAN from way out here).

  Reply

  2 Replies

  • 0%

    JessicaLaurie9 months, 1 week ago

    54?

    damn, It's cool!

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      1-2-Oscar9 months, 1 week ago

      54 Mbps is good for my wireless connection, but fiber optics ought to be able to do a whole lot better. If someone comes up with the product, I don't mind hooking up to a wire.

      Reply
• 0%

  engineer9 months, 1 week ago

  In my area where cable companies have monopolies, I try to the minimal amount of business with them. they are double the rates of locations where competition is allowed.

  Reply
• 0%

  reviewer9 months, 1 week ago

  I hate too but I'm ready to go back to cable. DSL is just not working for me here.

  Reply
• 0%

  GregD9 months, 1 week ago

  And yet their tech support will still suck...

  It's interesting, this fascination with throughput for the internet. At this rate, it seems to me that throughput numbers is just a game. Ye, with the highest throughput, wins...

  You do realize that even with 100Mbps, the bottle-neck will still always be the website you're trying to visit? No amount of throughput will make their end fast enough to tax your connection.

  Reply
• 0%

  erazer2 months, 4 weeks ago

  It is interesting, will docsis 3.0 be much more safe than other docsis 2.0 hardware as it can be show here - http://erazer.x-ren.com/2007/06/09/motorolas-bs...

  Reply