15)This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
About Propeller | Frequently Asked Questions | Help
© 2003-2008 Propeller. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
You know, I've got NOTHING against making things more energy efficient. Nothing whatsoever - I think it's a good idea. But, IN ADDITION to this, let's make MORE electricity from nuclear energy. Now THAT would REALLY reduce carbon emissions. THAT would REALLY make a significant difference. Well, a difference in some areas. Whether or not it will significantly affect global warming is still not clear. Not to me, anyway. But it WOULD help to reduce our dependence on non-renewable oil resources, and THAT is very important because we KNOW that the oil will eventually run out.
I agree that Nuclear energy would reduce carbon emmissions -- but it has a whole slew of other problems related to it as well. Sometimes it's better to go with the devil that you know and no the devil that you don't know.
Still -- something has to be figured out. I'm no nuclear physisist (I can barely spell it).
Where's cold fusion? Shouldn't we have that by now?
http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/mr-... Bussard Fusion Reactor
http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2006/11/eas...
Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/IEC_Fusion/ IEC Fusion Newsgroup
http://iecfusiontech.blogspot.com/ IEC Fusion Technology
Some inspired amateurs are working on another way
Spam - please report this idiot yet again.