
Gadgets & Tech – If you've got one of those Flashy new AJAX, WPF sites and don't provide an accessible text-based alternative, you can be sued under the Americans With Disabilities Act. Target Corp has already been successfully sued for failing to make its website accessible to the blind.
Dakota:
The National Federation of the Blind (NFB), which helped bring the suit against Target, has reached out to companies in the past, asking them to make their sites compatible with screen reading software, according to John Paré Jr., director of public relations for the NFB.
Since most companies make the requested changes, lawsuits are rare, but in late 1999/early 2000, the NFB sued AOL for the accessibility of its web site, according to Paré. The suit was eventually dropped after AOL made the changes. News site Arstechnica mentions the AOL story here here.
According to Paré, companies must design the HTML on their site so it can be interpreted by screen reading software.
The NFB keeps a list of web sites that have been certified, i.e., that can be interpreted by the software. The list is by no means comprehensive, and most major retailers, like Amazon.com, for instance, can be used with the reading software, even though they aren’t listed on the NFB's list, which can be found here.
In the case of Target.com, there were numerous difficulties for blind users, including the fact that the “check-out" feature wasn’t accessible on the web site, says Paré.
Netscape News contacted Target, who provided the following statement: “While disappointed the lawsuit was not entirely dismissed, Target is pleased with the court’s decision to deny the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. We believe our Web site complies with all applicable laws and are committed to vigorously defending this case. We will continue to implement technology that increases the usability of our Web site for all our guests, including those with disabilities.†(The same statement was given to other news outlets.)
Meanwhile, here is how the screen reading software works: If Paré, who is blind, visited Orbitz, for instance, and had screen reading software installed on his computer, a voice would read all of the text on the page. Short cuts allow users to just hear the links on a page, according to Paré, or automatically go to a certain entry field.
While there are different screen reading software options, JAWS, created by St. Petersburg, Florida-based company Freedom Scientific is one of the more popular readers, according to Paré.
According to Paré, it’s increasingly important for blind people to be able to access web sites since some companies, like airlines, for instance, offer web-only special deals.
2006-09-11 17:14:20
Target should argue that their program, with pictures and text, is actually MORE inclusive, since it provides ease of use to the hearing-impaired.
For all our wealth and power, for all that we have accomplished, medically and technologically, we are still unable to "fix" people who have suffered a loss of vision. Somehow, it is reasoned, we can only be "fair" if we "fix" the rest of society to conform with their limitations, no matter what the cost.
I don't see how even if Target's website talked to you, how it would be useful in purchasing items for the visually impaired. It may be useful for a news feed sight, but you can't shop at Target just from item descriptions.
This is another "non-sense" lawsuit that is brought upon several corporations these days. (remember the lawsuit against McDonald's for their product making people fat?)
gotta love this country!!
Blind people are also entitled enjoy the internet. Therefore I consider this case being a good example. ;-)
@TheAttacks, there is a thing called 'screen readers', actually even Windows XP has a 'Narrator' on board. Valid coded websites can be read by those programms. Hotkey navigation allows people with visual disabilities to navigate sites.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
A final ruling on the case in question still has yet to be issued, Target's motion to dimiss the case entirely was thrown out, however.