Gadgets & Tech

Visual-Only Websites Are One Step Closer To Illegal
This story has mostly positive ratings. 47 votes / 1 sink

Visual-Only Websites Are One Step Closer To Illegal

Gadgets & Tech – If you've got one of those Flashy new AJAX, WPF sites and don't provide an accessible text-based alternative, you can be sued under the Americans With Disabilities Act. Target Corp has already been successfully sued for failing to make its website accessible to the blind.

Tags: Americans With Disabilit, online, websites, technology, internet

Report

Propeller Anchor Commentary
Anchor

Dakota:
The National Federation of the Blind (NFB), which helped bring the suit against Target, has reached out to companies in the past, asking them to make their sites compatible with screen reading software, according to John Paré Jr., director of public relations for the NFB.

Since most companies make the requested changes, lawsuits are rare, but in late 1999/early 2000, the NFB sued AOL for the accessibility of its web site, according to Paré. The suit was eventually dropped after AOL made the changes. News site Arstechnica mentions the AOL story here here.

According to Paré, companies must design the HTML on their site so it can be interpreted by screen reading software.

The NFB keeps a list of web sites that have been certified, i.e., that can be interpreted by the software. The list is by no means comprehensive, and most major retailers, like Amazon.com, for instance, can be used with the reading software, even though they aren’t listed on the NFB's list, which can be found here.

In the case of Target.com, there were numerous difficulties for blind users, including the fact that the “check-out" feature wasn’t accessible on the web site, says Paré.

Netscape News contacted Target, who provided the following statement: “While disappointed the lawsuit was not entirely dismissed, Target is pleased with the court’s decision to deny the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. We believe our Web site complies with all applicable laws and are committed to vigorously defending this case. We will continue to implement technology that increases the usability of our Web site for all our guests, including those with disabilities.” (The same statement was given to other news outlets.)

Meanwhile, here is how the screen reading software works: If Paré, who is blind, visited Orbitz, for instance, and had screen reading software installed on his computer, a voice would read all of the text on the page. Short cuts allow users to just hear the links on a page, according to Paré, or automatically go to a certain entry field.

While there are different screen reading software options, JAWS, created by St. Petersburg, Florida-based company Freedom Scientific is one of the more popular readers, according to Paré.

According to Paré, it’s increasingly important for blind people to be able to access web sites since some companies, like airlines, for instance, offer web-only special deals.

2006-09-11 17:14:20

Filter Comments ›
1 - 9 of 9 Comments by 9 members  RSS Feed for comments

1

Add Comment
avatar
Reply

A final ruling on the case in question still has yet to be issued, Target's motion to dimiss the case entirely was thrown out, however.

avatar
Reply

Fixed Corey.

avatar
Reply

The title is a little misleading. It makes it sound like you aren't allowed to have a visual only version of the website. The is saying thats fine, but you need to also have an alternative.

avatar
Reply

Just how exactly are they supposed to make a website accessible to someone who is completely without vision? I'm seriously curious about that, I've seen themes for programs for those with vision problems, but never one for someone who is blind.

avatar
Reply

Target should argue that their program, with pictures and text, is actually MORE inclusive, since it provides ease of use to the hearing-impaired.

For all our wealth and power, for all that we have accomplished, medically and technologically, we are still unable to "fix" people who have suffered a loss of vision. Somehow, it is reasoned, we can only be "fair" if we "fix" the rest of society to conform with their limitations, no matter what the cost.

avatar
Reply

Users should note that the Americans with Disabilities Act only applies to corporate entities, so you can't be sued for your personal "Flashy new AJAX" site.

avatar
Reply

Is Target's website bad business policy? Perhaps. Is it discriminitory? Give me a break. And people wonder what's wrong with our country.

avatar
Reply

I don't see how even if Target's website talked to you, how it would be useful in purchasing items for the visually impaired. It may be useful for a news feed sight, but you can't shop at Target just from item descriptions.

This is another "non-sense" lawsuit that is brought upon several corporations these days. (remember the lawsuit against McDonald's for their product making people fat?)

gotta love this country!!

avatar
Reply

Blind people are also entitled enjoy the internet. Therefore I consider this case being a good example. ;-)

@TheAttacks, there is a thing called 'screen readers', actually even Windows XP has a 'Narrator' on board. Valid coded websites can be read by those programms. Hotkey navigation allows people with visual disabilities to navigate sites.

1

Add Comment

You must log in first to post a comment. Secure Signin

Not a member? Sign-up today!


Who voted on this story?

Who sunk this story?

Channels
AnchorsArt & DesignAutos
BooksCareers & JobsCelebrities
Do No EvilDo-It-YourselfFamily
FoodGadgets & TechGay & Lesbian
Health & FitnessHumorLove & Personals
MenMoneyMovies
MusicNewsPets
PoliticsPopular VideosReal Estate
ReligionScienceShopping
SportsTelevisionTravel
VideoVideo GamesWomen